Gaming

Epic Games Store vs Steam: The Rise of New Game Distribution Platforms and Challenges

Epic Games Store vs Steam The Rise of New Game Distribution Platforms and Challenges

Epic Games Store vs Steam: The Rise of New Game Distribution Platforms and Challenges

The world of digital game distribution has seen significant transformations over the past decade, with new platforms challenging the long-standing dominance of industry leaders. The most prominent example is the Epic Games Store, which has emerged as a key competitor to Steam, the market leader for years. This article delves into the rise of new game distribution platforms like the Epic Games Store, the challenges they pose to Steam, and the evolving landscape of digital game distribution.

The Rise of Epic Games Store

The Epic Games Store (EGS) was launched in December 2018, backed by Epic Games, the creators of the hugely successful battle royale game, Fortnite, and the widely-used Unreal Engine. Epic’s entry into the game distribution market was a direct challenge to Steam’s monopoly, offering a more developer-friendly revenue split and various exclusivity deals. This aggressive strategy helped EGS gain traction quickly.

  • Revenue Split: One of the primary attractions for developers was Epic’s favorable revenue share model. Epic Games Store offers developers 88% of the revenue, keeping only 12% as opposed to Steam’s 70/30 split. This significant difference in profit margins attracted many indie developers and larger studios.
  • Exclusive Titles: Another key strategy for Epic was securing exclusive titles. Through strategic partnerships and financial incentives, Epic was able to release major titles exclusively on its platform, including Metro Exodus, Borderlands 3, and Control. This practice stirred controversy among gamers but also forced more attention on the platform.
  • Free Game Giveaways: To entice users, EGS also began offering free games every week, including high-quality AAA and indie titles. This brought a steady influx of new users to the platform, building a loyal user base.

Steam’s Dominance and Its Response

Steam, launched by Valve Corporation in 2003, had been the unrivaled leader in the digital game distribution space for over a decade. Steam revolutionized how PC games were bought, downloaded, and updated, offering a vast library of games, community features, and frequent discounts.

  • Steam’s Advantages: Steam’s large user base, community features (such as user reviews, forums, and workshop for mods), and frequent seasonal sales made it a hub for gamers around the world. Its reputation for reliability and security made it the default choice for developers and players alike.
  • Weaknesses: Despite its dominance, Steam has faced criticism for its high revenue share, limited developer support, and the overwhelming number of low-quality games (often called “shovelware”) that flood the platform. These gaps allowed competitors like EGS to identify areas for improvement and target both developers and consumers more effectively.

Steam has responded to the rise of new competitors with changes to its revenue model and increased efforts to offer more value to both developers and players. However, it remains cautious about large-scale changes, given its massive user base and long-standing policies.

Challenges for Epic Games Store

Despite its quick rise, the Epic Games Store faces several significant challenges in competing with Steam, which retains the largest share of the PC game distribution market.

  • Limited Features: One of the biggest criticisms of EGS is its lack of features compared to Steam. Steam has spent years developing a robust platform with community forums, modding support, achievements, cloud saves, and more. EGS, by contrast, launched with a minimalistic approach, lacking many of these features. While Epic has been working to address these shortcomings, many gamers find the platform lacking in comparison to Steam.
  • Exclusivity Backlash: The practice of securing exclusivity deals for certain games, while beneficial for Epic in terms of gaining market share, has been controversial. Many gamers feel that exclusivity on a digital platform limits their choices and forces them to use a store they might otherwise avoid. This backlash has, at times, hurt Epic’s reputation among the gaming community, with some accusing the platform of being anti-consumer.
  • Competition Beyond Steam: EGS is not only competing with Steam but also with other platforms like GOG (Good Old Games), Origin (by Electronic Arts), Ubisoft Connect, and Microsoft Store. Each platform offers different incentives, such as DRM-free games on GOG or subscription-based access on Microsoft’s Xbox Game Pass for PC. This broader competition complicates Epic’s mission to become the dominant player in the market.

The Future of Game Distribution Platforms

The competition between Steam, Epic Games Store, and other platforms is likely to intensify in the coming years, as each platform continues to refine its offerings and appeal to different segments of the gaming market. There are several key trends that will shape the future of digital game distribution:

  • Developer-Centric Platforms: Epic’s focus on offering better revenue splits has opened the door for more developer-friendly platforms. As developers continue to push for better terms, other platforms may be forced to adopt similar models, leading to more options and power for developers in deciding where to launch their games.
  • Cross-Platform Play and Integration: The gaming industry is moving towards more cross-platform play, where users can play games with friends regardless of the platform they are on. This trend may lead to deeper integrations between platforms or the rise of cross-platform stores that prioritize seamless gaming experiences over exclusive titles.
  • Subscription Services: Services like Xbox Game Pass and PlayStation Now are becoming increasingly popular, offering gamers access to a library of games for a monthly fee. If such services gain further traction, standalone platforms like Steam and EGS may face challenges in maintaining user loyalty unless they adopt similar models or integrate subscription options.
  • User-Centered Innovations: While Epic’s model has centered around developers, future platforms may focus more on creating user-centric innovations, such as improved curation, better community engagement tools, and enhanced player experiences. Steam, in particular, has an edge in this area but will need to continue to innovate to stay ahead.

Conclusion

The rise of platforms like the Epic Games Store has introduced much-needed competition into the game distribution market, previously dominated by Steam. While EGS has found success with its developer-first approach and exclusive deals, it faces significant challenges in closing the gap with Steam in terms of features, user satisfaction, and long-term loyalty.

For gamers, this competition has resulted in more choices and better deals, but it has also sparked debates about platform exclusivity and fair competition. As the gaming industry continues to evolve, the landscape of digital distribution will likely undergo further shifts, with new models, platforms, and approaches reshaping the future of how games are distributed and played.

This is a thrilling time for both developers and players, as the increasing diversity in platforms signals a future where competition fuels innovation and leads to better experiences for all.

 

Epic Games Store vs Steam: The Rise of New Game Distribution Platforms and Challenges

 

 

Recommended Post

The Rise of Indie Games: Success Innovation and Diversity in Game Design

Rate this post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *